In arbitration, the decision is typically final and binding, with limited grounds for appeal.

In arbitration, the decision is typically final and binding, with limited grounds for appeal.

• A. The decision is always subject to court review
• B. The decision must be approved by a judge
• C. Arbitration requires a jury trial
• D. The decision is final and binding with limited appeal

Answer: (D)

Arbitration is designed to provide a final, binding resolution with only narrow grounds for challenging the award. The winner of the dispute generally gets a decision that ends the case, and a party can seek court review only on limited issues such as arbitrator misconduct, exceeding authority, or fraud—not a full merits appeal. This makes the statement that the decision is final and binding with limited appeal the best description of how arbitration works. Other options aren’t accurate because court review isn’t automatic, the award isn’t typically required to be approved by a judge before it takes effect, and arbitration usually doesn’t involve a jury trial.

Arbitration is designed to provide a final, binding resolution with only narrow grounds for challenging the award. The winner of the dispute generally gets a decision that ends the case, and a party can seek court review only on limited issues such as arbitrator misconduct, exceeding authority, or fraud—not a full merits appeal. This makes the statement that the decision is final and binding with limited appeal the best description of how arbitration works. Other options aren’t accurate because court review isn’t automatic, the award isn’t typically required to be approved by a judge before it takes effect, and arbitration usually doesn’t involve a jury trial.